Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '18 at 00:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 114
57% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 350
35% 284 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 83.1
56% 70 fps
MRender 58.9
Gravity 57.4
Splatting 75.3
54% 63.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 55%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigastone SS6200-128GB 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0724B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 195 195 201 198 201 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 442
Write 201
Mixed 231
SusWrite 197
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 26.3
99% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 165
139% 203 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 CT51264BA160BJ.C8 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback