Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170802
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '18 at 03:03
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 135
53% 90 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 211
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
Asus(1043 3021) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 17.8
16% 20.3 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 21.4
18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 60 63 62 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 69.4
Write 77.5
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 61.9
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 50%
Fujitsu MHW2160BH PL 160GB
56GB free
Firmware: 891F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 33 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 34.4
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 34.5
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 26%
Lexar JD FireFly 2GB
1GB free, PID a731
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 6.4
11% 10 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 14GB
1600, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 13.1
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback