Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '18 at 11:15
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 71
2-Core 137
60% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 436
41% 340 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 18
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 21.6
19% 23 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 420 292 186 188 186 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 391
Write 418
Mixed 348
SusWrite 273
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 34.9
120% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 259
194% 259 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81%
Great: 99%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
556GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 135 134 133 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 134
Write 134
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 133
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 80%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
873GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 135 135 136 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 139
Write 41.3
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 135
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 7.8
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback