Asus Maximus Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Maximus Formula (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090910
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '18 at 09:37
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6850-$57 4,150 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	44.3% Average	Memory 78 1-Core 34.2 2-Core 66.5 41% 59.6 Pts	4-Core 65.5 8-Core 67.4 9% 66.4 Pts	64-Core 67.3 4% 67.3 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3718) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.7% Above average	Lighting 64.7 Reflection 66 Parallax 57.6 53% 62.7 fps	MRender 70.1 Gravity 71.2 Splatting 72.2 58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 165 192 199 200 184 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.8% Above average	Read 250 Write 211 Mixed 184 SusWrite 172 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 22 83% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 72.6 DQ Mixed 113 88% 124 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 110GB free Firmware: 1AA01109 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 44 36 33 40 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 53.4 Write 39.2 Mixed 37.4 SusWrite 37.7 31% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 43GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 73 74 75 75 76 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 73 Write 47.5 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 71.7 44% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 43%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 40GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 86 90 90 90 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 87.9 Write 84.5 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 85.9 56% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 59%
Freecom Mobile Drive XXS 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 759GB free, PID fca9 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 27.3 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 16.5 32% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.7 161% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 51%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB 313 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 28GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 16 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 30.7 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 15.8 33% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 20%
USB DISK Pro 32GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 24GB free, PID 3623 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	3.75% Terrible	Read 13.6 Write 3 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 3.7 6% 5.95 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.75% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 6.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Maximus Formula Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Maximus Formula

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	14x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	9x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	5x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
Burst Elite 240GBPatriotBench 68%, 2,182 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	39x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369