Asus P5KR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KR  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080626
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 01 '16 at 23:46
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 79.9
42% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 128
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Zotac(19DA 1665) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 23
Parallax 17.8
16% 20.2 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 21.8
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 160GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 209
Write 86.9
Mixed 115
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 3.92
4K Mixed 6.38
40% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 46%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
252GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 83.6
Write 86.3
Mixed 73.9
61% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.3
79% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KR Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback