HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '18 at 09:10
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 155
52% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 595
54% 452 Pts
64-Core 1,922
119% 1,922 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.58
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 19.2
13% 16.3 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 16.8
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OWC Mercury Extr 480GB
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 180 179 229 225 216 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 265
Write 240
Mixed 255
SusWrite 205
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 21.2
68% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 124
102% 150 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 68%
LSI Logical Volume 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 210 211 211 210 208 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 34.3
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.4
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback