To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemIntel SandyBridge Platform
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100630
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 22:50
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46.2% Average
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 149
56% 117 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 411
42% 333 Pts
64-Core 411
28% 411 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Lighting 115
Reflection 78.3
Parallax 117
30% 104 fps
MRender 80.4
Gravity 113
Splatting 80.4
30% 91.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 163 133 128 128 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.4% Good
Read 249
Write 229
Mixed 226
SusWrite 152
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 33.4
105% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 186
140% 186 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$160
119GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 418 410 415 415 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 432
Mixed 313
SusWrite 416
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 32
119% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 150
162% 271 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
Intel X25-M 160GB
5GB free
Firmware: 2CV1
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 240
Write 99.8
Mixed 57.9
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 7.5
42% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 54.4
DQ Mixed 62
56% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 46%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$40
174GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 68.8
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 64.8
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST3000DM001-1CH166 802GB
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 170 168 168 165 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 128
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 167
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49%
Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 6,406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $56
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback