HP Pavilion m6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion m6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18A7
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140519
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 22:05
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-4400M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Memory 15.8
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 34
16% 26 Pts
4-Core 34.6
8-Core 12.7
4% 23.6 Pts
64-Core 13.6
1% 13.6 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Trinity SCRAPPER MOBILE
HP(103C 18A7) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 3.37
Reflection 3.81
Parallax 3.06
3% 3.41 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 4
3% 3.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 120 101 101 108 113 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 301
Write 118
Mixed 154
SusWrite 106
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 9.4
48% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 94.7
DQ Mixed 114
84% 110 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston 9905603-004.A00G 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 353
11% 353 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion m6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion m6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback