Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 19:20
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 206
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 394
54% 399 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 77.3
46% 66.2 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 54.3
47% 57.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssd2sc12 0GC1DH16T2-T 120GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 119 119 114 124 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 390
Write 137
Mixed 189
SusWrite 121
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 34.1
111% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 118
98% 142 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 69%
Samsung PM830 2.5" 128GB
65GB free
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 196 176 174 193 231 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 448
Write 262
Mixed 258
SusWrite 202
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 22.8
92% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 73.1
DQ Mixed 127
107% 162 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
150GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 208 208 214 212 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 360
Write 341
Mixed 329
SusWrite 207
70% 309 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 37.3
119% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 201
154% 209 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
247GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 158 159 158 160 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 164
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 156
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.6% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 23.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 21
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback