Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '18 at 04:32
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 83.7 1-Core 48.1 2-Core 95.9 50% 75.9 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 281 30% 237 Pts	64-Core 282 18% 282 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340 26,573 User benchmarks, average bench 54% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	59% Above average	Lighting 73.1 Reflection 64.8 Parallax 90.4 60% 76.1 fps	MRender 64.1 Gravity 62.9 Splatting 81 58% 69.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 82 82 82 81 83 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.3% Average	Read 280 Write 173 Mixed 164 SusWrite 108 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 24.8 90% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 50.4 DQ Mixed 30.6 26% 36 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 94%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$39 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 931GB free Firmware: GKAOAB0A SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 76 77 78 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 66.2 Write 82.2 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 76.5 49% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 1024, 4096, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.7% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.6 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16