DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds)
Motherboard	DELL 0X501H
Memory	9.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090728
Uptime	20.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '18 at 01:19
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Memory 83.7 1-Core 69.9 2-Core 125 58% 92.9 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 248 28% 218 Pts	64-Core 245 15% 245 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 36.1 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 31.1 29% 31.9 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 37 Splatting 35.1 30% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 256GB-$194 1,962 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN263 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 80 188 179 164 180 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.2% Above average	Read 237 Write 34.3 Mixed 166 SusWrite 154 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 24 79% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 92 91% 144 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 98%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 931GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 102 104 105 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 111 Write 102 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 104 73% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 114 116 116 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 61.1 Write 61.8 Mixed 41 SusWrite 115 51% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 84%
WDC WD20 EADS-00R6B0 2TB 84GB free, PID 012a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 26 26 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16% Very poor	Read 31 Write 24.8 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 25.6 34% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1 MB/s

BUFFALO External HDD 4TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1.5TB free, PID 0286 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 33 Write 28 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 27.1 38% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 20GB 10,519 User benchmarks, average bench 39% null MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.5 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 8.4 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	314x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	19x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	20x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
MKNSSDS2120GB 120GBMushkinBench 65%, 202 samples	15x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	42x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16