Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M730  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A2
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '18 at 21:19
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 199
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 560
60% 477 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 38.8
37% 42.7 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 35.2
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 429 435 420 417 433 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 423
Mixed 373
SusWrite 434
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 49.7
165% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 362
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 134%
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
38GB free
Firmware: 100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.3% Above average
Read 240
Write 135
Mixed 146
SusWrite 133
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 22.8
99% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 49.6
65% 117 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 79%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 167 172 170 172 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 162
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 170
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G73QH0- 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 22.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M730 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback