Asus X555YI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus X555YI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555YI
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160429
Uptime72.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '18 at 14:18
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 76.3
37% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 136
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Asus(1043 1B9D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1601.0
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.38% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 3.81
2% 4.07 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 3.83
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.38%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
735GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0R5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 96 99 99 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 85.2
Write 100
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 94.9
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BF160BJ.C4F Hynix HMT451S6CFR6A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 7
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555YI Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555YI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback