bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardGigabyte 945GME-DS2
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070528
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateOct 30 '18 at 13:30
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6700-$230
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 29.8
2-Core 58.8
38% 53.8 Pts
4-Core 58.5
8-Core 57.7
8% 58.1 Pts
64-Core 58.3
4% 58.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
MSI(1462 0881) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.52 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.45 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ES0060S 60GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 320A13F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 61 62 59 57 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 121
Write 68.7
Mixed 98.6
SusWrite 58
19% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 22.9
84% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 27.9
DQ Write 75.5
DQ Mixed 30.4
29% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 39%
Excelstor Technology J8160S 165GB
95GB free
Firmware: P22OA70A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 64 60 57 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 64.9
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 60
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback