Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '18 at 08:56
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 5.9 GHz, turbo 5.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 180
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 460
51% 401 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 88.5
Parallax 157
91% 119 fps
MRender 86.3
Gravity 111
Splatting 127
91% 108 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 77 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 472
Write 433
Mixed 388
SusWrite 105
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 32.6
116% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 245
205% 295 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST3750330NS 750GB-$76
133GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 93
Write 92.6
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 100
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-084.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68XP-UD3P Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback