HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82FE
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit, Χρώματα 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '18 at 21:42
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 RADEON R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 120
51% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 193
27% 198 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 835C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.10.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.22% Terrible
Lighting 9.37
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 11.9
8% 11 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 10.4
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.22%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 298 297 302 304 299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 424
Write 394
Mixed 384
SusWrite 305
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 42.3
128% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 228
171% 229 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15D4/4G Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 8GB
2666, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 13.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.6
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback