Guoshuo X79

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Guoshuo X79 (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '18 at 15:27
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 56.3 2-Core 114 54% 84.9 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 444 40% 334 Pts	64-Core 814 50% 814 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8569) 2GB CLim: 1643 MHz, MLim: 1772 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 38.7 Reflection 37.5 Parallax 37.8 32% 38 fps	MRender 40.2 Gravity 35.8 Splatting 37 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 126 135 142 138 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 421 Write 154 Mixed 213 SusWrite 136 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 39 143% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 87.1 92% 155 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 740GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 184 183 182 183 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 140 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 183 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 2x8GB 364 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 9.6 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Guoshuo X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2670Intel $53Bench 67%, 4,803 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
GeForce GT 625NvidiaBench 2%, 1,691 samples	1x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	1x

SSD
Z400s 256GBSanDisk $221Bench 72%, 10,770 samples	1x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70CH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 364 samples	1x
M393B2K70DM0- 1x16GBSamsungBench 21%, 25 samples	1x
M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70CH0- 16GBSamsungBench 50%, 50 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 17% - Very poor

Total price: $313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16