HP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3568
Memory3.6 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '18 at 16:04
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3320M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 30.7
2-Core 61.8
36% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 62
8-Core 62
8% 62 Pts
64-Core 62.4
4% 62.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 40%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 120GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0607A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 350 349 342 217 259 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 482
Write 350
Mixed 362
SusWrite 311
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 29
99% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 114
88% 119 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT112S6TFR8C-H9 5GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback