PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120629 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 25 '18 at 07:13 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | JPN-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
|
86.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.10.1
|
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 70 81 88 95 94 MB/s
|
52.6%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
233GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 81 92 96 102 100 MB/s
|
64%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
93GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 104 105 105 104 MB/s
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS54503 320GB
143GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
69.4%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 70x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 49x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 21x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 22x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)Intel $15Bench 2%, 6,831 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $628 |