Asus P5Q DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 23 '14 at 14:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 89.4
30% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 175
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 34% Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 41.7
27% 35.4 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 36.3
26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.9% Average
Read 254
Write 138
Mixed 168
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 14.9
72% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 66.5
DQ Mixed 38
42% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 95%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
420GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 118
Write 111
Mixed 97.3
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 65%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00UU3A0 500GB
306GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.4% Average
Read 109
Write 102
Mixed 57.7
110% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.33
71% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 45%
Typical P5Q DELUXE Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback