Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P35-DS3  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090618
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 24 '18 at 14:48
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 35
2-Core 69.8
40% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 135
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B E215) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 27.4
15% 21.5 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 20.8
15% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 126 82 80 111 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 214
Write 85.2
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 94.4
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 10.2
43% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P35-DS3 Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback