HP ProDesk 600 G3 PCI MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G3 PCI MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82B3
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171107
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 24 '18 at 14:29
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 464
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82B3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9.69
Parallax 6.47
6% 7.69 fps
MRender 0.05
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 14.1
6% 6.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 162
Write 93.5
Mixed 72.9
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 104%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.1
Write 7.2
Mixed 13.9
16% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-4 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G3 PCI MT Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G3 PCI MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback