MSI Eclipse SLI (MS-7520)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7520
MotherboardMSI Eclipse SLI (MS-7520)  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 10.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '18 at 08:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 131
59% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 342
35% 285 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 25% Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
system 256GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 285 301 280 129 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
Read 492
Write 312
Mixed 208
SusWrite 203
67% 304 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 15.1
57% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 88.1
DQ Write 24.8
DQ Mixed 32.2
30% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 49%
Data 3TB
878GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 221 222 226 231 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 227
Write 220
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 219
129% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.5
280% 2 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 128%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 46GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Eclipse SLI (MS-7520) Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI Eclipse SLI (MS-7520)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback