Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '16 at 03:36
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11% Very poor
Memory 17.6
1-Core 17.1
2-Core 24.6
12% 19.8 Pts
4-Core 26
8-Core 25.6
3% 25.8 Pts
64-Core 35.2
2% 35.2 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP0842N 80GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BH100-50 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 29.6
Mixed 27.5
21% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.33
74% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 33%
Mass Storage Device 500GB
413GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 27.8
Mixed 15.5
29% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.17
52% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.71% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 1.2
MC Mixed 1.8
5% 1.77 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.77 GB/s
Latency 339
12% 339 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 5.71%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback