Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 105 2-Core 191 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 390 52% 387 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 130 116 122 108 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 398 Write 304 Mixed 301 SusWrite 145 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 71 4K Mixed 39.3 133% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 276 211% 285 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 124%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 195GB free Firmware: VT100-52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 39 39 40 40 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 65 Write 69 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 39.7 40% 53.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 11.4 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	31x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	31x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	27x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $569

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16