Asrockrack EP2C612D8C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrockrack EP2C612D8C  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '18 at 05:06
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 54.6
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 78.1
36% 57.3 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 315
29% 242 Pts
64-Core 1,117
69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 9.28
10% 10.5 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 9.97
Splatting 15
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.92%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 377 382 370 358 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 426
Write 419
Mixed 368
SusWrite 384
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 25.4
91% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 350
256% 333 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
718GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 177 177 178 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 163
Mixed 100
SusWrite 177
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EP2C612D8C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrockrack EP2C612D8C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback