Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '18 at 19:58
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 97.1
1-Core 81
2-Core 155
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 407
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 32.9
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 37.9
27% 33.6 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 33.5
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 107 109 109 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.4% Average
Read 230
Write 190
Mixed 160
SusWrite 103
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 27
98% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 39.9
36% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 116%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 107 109 109 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 137
Write 126
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 105
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.3
250% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 49.9
80% 49.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback