Dell OptiPlex 3010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 3010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3010  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 19:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 91
2-Core 142
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 227
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2345) 2GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 34.8
24% 31.7 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 36.9
25% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 218 171 107 78 69 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 255
Write 239
Mixed 204
SusWrite 145
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 27.3
96% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 114
109% 170 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI Kingston KTW149-ELD 5GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.5% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 9.5
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3010 Builds (Compare 4,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback