Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 15:18
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 145
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 436
43% 352 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 1111 MHz, MLim: 451 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.13
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 4.84
4% 5.01 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 4.53
Splatting 7.17
5% 5.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 151 102 85 83 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 466
Write 423
Mixed 133
SusWrite 136
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 24.1
96% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 123
111% 172 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 208 208 209 209 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 156
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 208
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
925GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 43 31 11 31 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 201
Write 86.8
Mixed 77
SusWrite 38.4
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback