HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 14-cm0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A3
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180726
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 08:15
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 39.5
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 135
44% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 224
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84A3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 2.88
2% 3.33 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 5.04
3% 3.54 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GMTS820S 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0123A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 123 17 22 17 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 418
Write 312
Mixed 289
SusWrite 86.8
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 9.1
39% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 50.7
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 12.6
15% 26.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 119 116 118 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 138
Write 81.3
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 117
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.7
288% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-cm0xxx Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback