Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 168%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '18 at 12:42
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 1,081
94% 803 Pts
64-Core 1,853
115% 1,853 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 3700 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 258
Parallax 258
183% 247 fps
MRender 284
Gravity 248
Splatting 164
183% 232 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 166%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1401 1229 1229 1228 1046 522 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,940
Write 1,768
Mixed 765
SusWrite 1,109
312% 1,395 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 66.6
234% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,366
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 1,046
815% 1,129 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 270%
Great: 302%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
522GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1498 1246 1253 1249 1249 1248 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2040
Write 1,800
Mixed 942
SusWrite 1,290
340% 1,518 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 67.9
240% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,297
DQ Write 983
DQ Mixed 1,017
794% 1,099 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 285%
Great: 302%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 140 138 140 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 139
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 99%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
2TB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 130 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 72.5
Write 110
Mixed 33
SusWrite 130
63% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.7
262% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 87%
Asmt ASM1352-PM 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 40.3
Write 40.8
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 21.3
25% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18%
Great: 107%
Asmt ASM1352-PM 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 41.5
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 21.4
27% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4266 C19 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 15
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 14.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 12.1
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,256
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback