Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '18 at 09:41
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 826
76% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,117
69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.5% Good
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 66.7
64% 73.8 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 68.9
57% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 47 12 67 44 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 465
Write 386
Mixed 17
SusWrite 69.1
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 1.2
61% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 79.6
DQ Write 40
DQ Mixed 0.7
16% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$45
354GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 129 129 129 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 115
Write 66.5
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 129
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 108%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
7GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 42 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 40
Write 30.2
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 41.8
48% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 21
Write 4.8
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 7.1
12% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.1
152% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.4% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 19.7
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $651
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback