Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11SPL-F
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '18 at 08:44
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
CPU, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 187
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 560
58% 469 Pts
64-Core 1,842
114% 1,842 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 182
Parallax 183
128% 174 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 174
Splatting 121
113% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SMI DISK 253GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 268 274 275 274 274 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 437
Write 278
Mixed 270
SusWrite 273
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 34.6
126% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 188
162% 238 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF Samsung M393A1K43BB0-CRC HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
161% Outstanding
MC Read 73.4
MC Write 66.2
MC Mixed 61.8
192% 67.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 161%
Great: 168%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback