Asus M5A97

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121025
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 20 '18 at 06:11
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 144
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 435
43% 352 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Nvidia(10DE 0898) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 19.8
18% 22.4 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 23.6
20% 25.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
581GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 156 165 163 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 157
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 160
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
420GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 96 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 76.6
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 95.5
54% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 20.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 16
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback