User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardSupermicro X8DTN+-F
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '18 at 13:30
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 152
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 612
54% 459 Pts
64-Core 1,160
72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT
Asus(1043 034F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 0.38
1% 1 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.87
2% 1.89 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 92 93 95 92 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 131
Write 118
Mixed 134
SusWrite 95.1
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 26.7
79% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 35.5
34% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 8x4GB
8 of 18 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 5.8
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback