Asus PRIME H370-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H370-A (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180226
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '18 at 08:51
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 90.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 202 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 671 66% 538 Pts	64-Core 840 52% 840 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 131 Reflection 144 Parallax 136 107% 137 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 131 Splatting 107 95% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNA240GESC 240GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 129GB free Firmware: SBFB12.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 464 Write 287 Mixed 362 82% 371 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 36.5 140% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 218 192% 287 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 88%
Toshiba THNSNJ128G8NU 500GB 321GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 478 Write 443 Mixed 320 92% 414 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 34.1 114% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 281 228% 322 MB/s

HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 288GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 114 Write 39 Mixed 22.2 43% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 144 Write 140 Mixed 104 96% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GB 3,272 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	71.6% Very good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 19.9 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 23.7 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H370-A Builds (Compare 585 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370-A

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	141x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	66x
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	59x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	34x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	27x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	21x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	19x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 81%, 12,182 samples	17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $650

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16