Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 70.8 2-Core 199 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 611 60% 494 Pts	64-Core 844 52% 844 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6213 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Lighting 42.5 Reflection 41.4 Parallax 37.7 35% 40.5 fps	MRender 51.6 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 39.4 35% 42.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ25 256GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1102 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 476 Mixed 499 110% 493 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 73.2 4K Mixed 32.6 117% 43.4 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 104 115% 197 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 1x8GB 177 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 11.2 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 11.8 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16