HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory92.4 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '18 at 20:42
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 173
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 601
57% 470 Pts
64-Core 1,598
99% 1,598 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W9000-$3,600
AMD(1002 031E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 58.5
38% 45.5 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 45.9
Splatting 38.7
32% 38.2 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 429 434 433 401 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 433
Mixed 415
SusWrite 418
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 35.9
122% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 292
238% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 125%
Marvell Raid VD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 401 393 400 400 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 339
Write 292
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 399
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 2.3
11% 4.97 MB/s
DQ Read 6.6
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 11.8
8% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C-PB M393B1K70DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C-PB Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C-PB M393B1K70DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C-PB M393B1K70... 96GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 33.1
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.6
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback