HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory6.3 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100804
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '18 at 15:51
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B95
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 88
48% 72 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 171
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 3047) 368MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.44
1% 0.88 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.57
1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 498GB
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 197 206 216 221 218 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 245
Write 229
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 207
137% 189 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 130%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 41GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback