Asus M60J

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus M60J (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M60J
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '18 at 00:22
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 82.6 1-Core 64.1 2-Core 85.1 52% 77.3 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 206 22% 175 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240M 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 202A) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	2.73% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 4.92 Parallax 1.28 2% 3.1 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 3.57 3% 3.89 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.73% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 206 176 179 202 203 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.4% Average	Read 220 Write 196 Mixed 182 SusWrite 190 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 19.3 54% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 174 131% 174 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 124%
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40 13,598 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 72GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 59 63 63 64 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 60.9 Write 55 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 61.4 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 80AD HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.7% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 10.3 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M60J Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M60J

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	11x
Core i7 Q 820Intel $119Bench 52%, 2,269 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples	13x

SSD
WDS250G2B0A 250GBWDCBench 88%, 4,642 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	2x
99U5428-020.A00LF 80AD HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 12GBKingstonBench 34%, 2 samples	2x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 80CE M471B5173BH0-CK0 6GBUnknownBench 28%, 4 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16