Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '18 at 21:55
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 19,875 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 78.8 1-Core 66.9 2-Core 126 56% 90.5 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 211 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 2983) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	62.1% Good	Lighting 77.9 Reflection 81.7 Parallax 75.4 64% 78.3 fps	MRender 79.6 Gravity 73.4 Splatting 67 59% 73.3 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 69 76 83 80 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 126 Write 96.5 Mixed 117 SusWrite 79.2 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 28.2 104% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 98.1 DQ Mixed 97.1 76% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 73%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 217GB free Firmware: CP100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 72 72 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 74.5 Write 85 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 71.5 52% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 43%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 556GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 156 158 157 156 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 143 Mixed 82 SusWrite 157 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB 24,592 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.7% Average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 17.4 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 12.3 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	19x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	11x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	8x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x

SSD
S101 256GBFanxiangBench 63%, 810 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	4x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $375

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16