MSI Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B46
MotherboardMSI Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46)  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '18 at 18:09
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 765
69% 582 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 130
Parallax 138
101% 131 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 123
Splatting 105
93% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 265 234 237 234 234 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 411
Mixed 364
SusWrite 269
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 52.6
179% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 316
240% 323 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 187 189 190 190 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 84
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 187
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 175 177 177 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 139
Write 99.6
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 176
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 114%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
29GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.5 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.4
10% 10 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 111 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 158
Write 164
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 114
154% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 113 113 112 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 169
Write 168
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 114
154% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46) Builds (Compare 2,798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $954
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback