bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System BOAMOT-499
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H310M-R R2.0
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '18 at 12:28
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 226
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 327
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 3.57
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 3.87
3% 4.28 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 9.78
6% 6.66 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 153 153 153 154 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 459
Mixed 364
SusWrite 183
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 54.6
188% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 345
262% 353 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
330GB free
Firmware: 0204 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 372 376 388 370 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67% Good
Read 304
Write 363
Mixed 261
SusWrite 377
74% 326 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 24
80% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 140
108% 147 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 67%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback