| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180420 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 15 '18 at 11:04 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.6%
Good
|
70% 127 Pts
|
50% 376 Pts
|
22% 351 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
|
27.7%
Poor
|
28% 29.4 fps
|
27% 33.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$30
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 185 197 208 204 205 MB/s
|
116%
Outstanding
|
122% 168 MB/s
|
135% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB
0GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.5 4.6 4.4 4.8 4.5 MB/s
|
5.4%
Terrible
|
12% 10.6 MB/s
|
23% 2.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown R748G2133U2S-UO 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.9%
Below average
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 451 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 68x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 64x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 49x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 34x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $187 |