HP xw4600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP xw4600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AA0h
Memory5.1 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '16 at 06:07
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 80
42% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 160
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX
Nvidia(10DE 039C) 768MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 2.94
5% 4.3 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 6.67
Splatting 2.57
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 6%
AMD Radeon HD 6350
HP(103C 2126) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2.09
1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1.5TB
264GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 183
Mixed 156
131% 175 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.63
140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 106%
Great: 136%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 215GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 177
Mixed 153
130% 174 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.48
100% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 106%
Great: 176%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 44GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw4600 Workstation Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw4600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback