MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 19:40
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 191
79% 134 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 841
71% 610 Pts
64-Core 1319
82% 1319 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.1% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 90.9
54% 74.5 fps
MRender 80.2
Gravity 75.1
Splatting 50.8
54% 68.7 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 4 999GB
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2734 2289 1196 1197 1200 1204 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2100
Write 3,067
Mixed 1,681
SusWrite 1,637
479% 2,121 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 70.6
236% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 574
DQ Write 616
DQ Mixed 522
413% 570 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 284%
Great: 380%
Amd-raid Array 3 999GB
930GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 798
Write 1,002
Mixed 775
SusWrite 104
150% 670 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 39.9
162% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 317
252% 344 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 104%
Great: 410%
Amd-raid ST3500630AS 500GB
350GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 40.2
Write 45.1
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 56.1
33% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 40%
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
930GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 104 105 106 106 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 112
Write 156
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 104
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
157% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 176%
Amd-raid Array 2 149GB
139GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 105 106 106 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64% Good
Read 118
Write 132
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 104
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.2
251% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 31.5
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 27.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 70.7
56% 70.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 1,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback