Gigabyte GA-B150-HD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B150-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 07:01
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 434
58% 436 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 59.9
55% 65.7 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 65.8
55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
345GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 64 59 58 65 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 74.8
Write 64.7
Mixed 56
SusWrite 61
48% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39%
Great: 57%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
310GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 104 104 106 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 105
Write 110
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 105
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 112%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 90 80 77 92 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 83.2
Write 91
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 85.8
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB
41GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.9 14 7.3 7.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
6.63% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 7
Mixed 15
SusWrite 7.3
16% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M4A2400C14 Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.6
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 20.1
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B150-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback