Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD5  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 00:14
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 96.5
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 136
64% 101 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 312
38% 288 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5850
XFX(1682 2970) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 23.1
19% 20 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 17.2
13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 97 90 96 97 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 136
Write 111
Mixed 112
SusWrite 95.6
26% 114 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 26.6
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 31.3
32% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 61%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 132 133 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 133
Write 129
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 132
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 23.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 15.5
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 61%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback