Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V GEN3  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 22:39
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 95.7
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 192
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 503
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E207) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 45.7
30% 36.2 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 32.1
25% 30.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASX900S3-128GM 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 118 117 113 115 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68% Good
Read 400
Write 138
Mixed 196
SusWrite 116
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 33.7
124% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 143
109% 148 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
316GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 91 88 89 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 90
Write 94.5
Mixed 54
SusWrite 88.8
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
225GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 91.6
Write 12.7
Mixed 44.9
SusWrite 54.7
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
205GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 54 52 54 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 59.4
Write 39.3
Mixed 41
SusWrite 53.4
36% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 43%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$94
221GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 105 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54% Above average
Read 83.2
Write 92.3
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 104
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.7
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V GEN3 Builds (Compare 862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback