Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '18 at 20:34
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 96.7 2-Core 188 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 339 47% 348 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Lighting 41.4 Reflection 32.6 Parallax 38.9 34% 37.6 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 37.4 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 460 Write 436 Mixed 330 91% 409 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 40.7 139% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 392 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 333 260% 357 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 352GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 143 138 144 147 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 141 Write 142 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 141 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 1,941 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	350x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	168x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	123x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	96x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	59x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	23x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	34x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $424

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16